Prime Ximbo:
Treasury (USD):
0
3
9
9
4
3

Ximboland Clock

Trump

Posts
187
Created
20.03.2017
Author
British Ambi
Pia Margrethe
Level 71
Status: Citizen
Sex Appeal: 280353
Reputation: 109150
Posts: 15842
Atheista
14.03.2018 16:36:41
Pia Margrethe

DeeDee88 wrote: "but she believes i am insane and need help:)
and her only reason for this statement was...that i do not think like her:)"

No, it is because you do not THINK.

14.03.2018 16:36:41
La ruta nos aportó otro paso natural.
Forudsigelse er meget vanskelig, især hvis det handler om fremtiden
(Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future) - Niels Bohr
As regards your life: why make a tragedy of a one act play? - Dan O'Neil
Erika Femm
Level 15
Status: Citizen
Sex Appeal: 2604
Reputation: 1601
Posts: 9
Reasonopia
14.03.2018 21:06:17
Erika Femm

That is quite laughable

14.03.2018 21:06:17
HeavenLeighBimbo
Level 129
Status: Citizen
Sex Appeal: 1695423
Reputation: 258672
Posts: 7188
Freethinkerland
14.03.2018 21:13:09
HeavenLeighBimbo

Erika Femm wrote:
That is quite laughable
[End Quote]

   When you are insulted and abused, by Haters.....   you are certainly correct...........     
           I've seen evil face to face......      Is it fair to laugh, at the  retarded, 'Thinking' of adult's?
   I do  <   more often, than I care too.....
   I don't hate fools,   I just Pity them.........   You  cant hate 'STUPID'.....   They are just product's of their own environment.
   Garbage in   ='s garbage OUT.....   A perfect system for EVIL to wager, WAR.
    I just find it Funny.........   My son's are armed and very dangerous, because I trained them in warfare....
    No president, 
Trump included will ever stop the American Spirit.....     Liberalism is self-destructive so I bought my son's, military grade weapons....   something to protect them from the Criminal's with a free pass to rob rape and steal......... 
  America is a thief's paradise.
     Now we have TRUMP....   Thank GOD.    1 year,   and he has done AMAZING thing's for LAW and ORDER......
     I fully support him and even if I do think he is an ass, too.....   He is doing what is RIGHT   for my Nation of America.
   I'll leave you all to discriminate, and Hate a Man you dont even Know. 
 
In essence   you are the HATER you HATE so much.         because all of your information come's from propagandist agenda's.         Social media, /      piff.........        
        The dumbest of the Dumb are now Hero's....   LOLROF
   What a brilliant STUPIDITY.     

14.03.2018 21:13:09
Image result for winter wonderland banner
Mindy
Level 104
Status: Citizen
Sex Appeal: 880414
Reputation: 129351
Posts: 1502
Agnostica
15.03.2018 03:30:31
Mindy

Erika Femm wrote:
Actually you do have the highest tax rate. California 13.3% Oregon 9.9% Minnesota 9.85% Iowa 8.98% New Jersey 8.97% Vermont 8.95% District of Columbia 8.95% New York 8.82% And i am sorry to say but i dont see california ever having a surplus. Perhaps if the state spent within it means and didnt rely on the rest of the country to subsidize them. Of course i cant talk much on that im in new york we do the same thing. But thats just NYC running the state. I dont have the time nore patiance to attack your points one by one. Perhaps your shouldnt get your information fromm CNN. Speaking of fake news.

California combined rates are actually 9th highest in the country.  That 13% is on single persons making 1 mil plus.  The wealthy get taxed harder in California...which is th way it should be everywhere. The average rate is a around 6.5% (a lil under), and you are not paying 10%+ until you make a few hundred K per year.  You can't just take the highest number and call that the state tax.  worth noting that for all the mess that California has been in for years that they are now in a position of being one of th few states actually lowering various taxes.

Sure...California just gets into the top 20% for state tax...but it is trade-off.  Where I live there is no personal state tax....but our social programs are horrid.  Conversely, it is tough to argue that California has some of the best.  If you want social funding that means taxes barring some mega resource that can be heavily taxed and a company not packing up.  Personally, I wish we paid personal state taxes here as it would help bolster education and other social needs, and would also combat high costs of living for many people who really can't afford it....no state tax means high utility, less than stellar roads and sales taxes (which again hurt those with less money.

Taxes are all in how you look at it.  Good school, roads, mental health assistance, lower property taxes, etc...you pay...it is a smidget of socialism.  It is really when you pay a healthy tax and don't see those good social programs one should be concerned...I mean, unless you are hardcore conservative and say meh to those with low income / in need.  There is something to be said for flat taxes...each person is looked at equally.  Personally, I side with those that have the income paying a lil more for the greater good of those around them...people with cash are not hurting...so why not.  California has diverse has brackets ranging from 1% to 13.3 and I believe 27 variations in total...pretty obvious they are taking a bit of a socialistic approach in it all.  They are NOT the highest on average and the are not the lowest...they are in that top quarter and essentially looking at it as 'we have good and evolving social programs, better than most.'  It is a pretty progressive state that affords a lot of social and environmental consciousness...so I can't say the premium for living there is a waste.

15.03.2018 03:30:31
Make your parents proud, your enemies jealous, and yourself happy.  The only thing that can prevent you is you! 

Hugz to my BL: stalker...you know who you are.  Lil creepy, but thanks for the pedestal. 
Bebe92583
Level 59
Status: First Prime Bimbo (2015)
Sex Appeal: 163763
Reputation: 51359
Posts: 1184
Antitheocra
15.03.2018 05:42:31
Bebe92583

Mindy wrote:


California combined rates are actually 9th highest in the country.  That 13% is on single persons making 1 mil plus.  The wealthy get taxed harder in California...which is th way it should be everywhere. The average rate is a around 6.5% (a lil under), and you are not paying 10%+ until you make a few hundred K per year.  You can't just take the highest number and call that the state tax.  worth noting that for all the mess that California has been in for years that they are now in a position of being one of th few states actually lowering various taxes.

Sure...California just gets into the top 20% for state tax...but it is trade-off.  Where I live there is no personal state tax....but our social programs are horrid.  Conversely, it is tough to argue that California has some of the best.  If you want social funding that means taxes barring some mega resource that can be heavily taxed and a company not packing up.  Personally, I wish we paid personal state taxes here as it would help bolster education and other social needs, and would also combat high costs of living for many people who really can't afford it....no state tax means high utility, less than stellar roads and sales taxes (which again hurt those with less money.

Taxes are all in how you look at it.  Good school, roads, mental health assistance, lower property taxes, etc...you pay...it is a smidget of socialism.  It is really when you pay a healthy tax and don't see those good social programs one should be concerned...I mean, unless you are hardcore conservative and say meh to those with low income / in need.  There is something to be said for flat taxes...each person is looked at equally.  Personally, I side with those that have the income paying a lil more for the greater good of those around them...people with cash are not hurting...so why not.  California has diverse has brackets ranging from 1% to 13.3 and I believe 27 variations in total...pretty obvious they are taking a bit of a socialistic approach in it all.  They are NOT the highest on average and the are not the lowest...they are in that top quarter and essentially looking at it as 'we have good and evolving social programs, better than most.'  It is a pretty progressive state that affords a lot of social and environmental consciousness...so I can't say the premium for living there is a waste.

Yes we do value our environment and social outreach in the communities. we also value higher education and to that end voted in new taxes in 2016 for schools. we also banned plastic bags from stores,tightened up gun control laws to limit the magazine for guns /rifles to  a maximum of 10 bullets if you need more than that for hunting you are a pretty poor shot and should head for the range and practice more. to have progressive programs it costs money .As a Californian I opt to pay the price in the form of taxes. Wall Street Journal did the article that points out that California will indeed produce a budget surplus in 2019 while the state has a balanced budget. Our average contribution to the Federal Government is $450 billion dollars annually we get back roughly 78 cents for every dollar we pay out to the federal government. This makes us a donor state not a welfare state as most of the states that voted for Trump are "Welfare States" meaning the Trump states by and large get back more than they actually pay in Annually. I actually don't watch CNN . I also Think Trumps attack on the American Media is based on his over sized EGO. Fox on the other hand was Sued for pushing a false narrative on Seth Rich. even after being asked by the young mans parents to cease and desist. Fox is the home of debunked false narratives and conspiracy theories. Trump singled out CNN just to have a whipping post because he is a bully not because they actually deliver fake news ,They don't and when they get something wrong they admit it and post the correction. I watch a variety of news stations just not CNN (too many trump apologists there) o rFox for reasons already stated

15.03.2018 05:42:31
 Life is too Short ,Live for today, tomorrow may never get here!
Pia Margrethe
Level 71
Status: Citizen
Sex Appeal: 280353
Reputation: 109150
Posts: 15842
Atheista
15.03.2018 19:07:55
Pia Margrethe

In answer to HLB's comment:

I do not use social media, watch CNN only when I am travelling and stay in hotels and have never actually seen Faux news. (BUT I remain fairly well-informed.) But social media (particularly Facebook) was hijacked during the US election to promote discord and (later) to favor the Multiply Bankrupt Mogul (MBM). That someone wishes to train her sons in the use of 'military grade weapons' to defend the rampant rape and theft in the US, first displays incredible ignorance of the crime statistics from the US (I believe HLB is from Idaho, where only sheep need fear sexual assault and not Baltimore or Chicago). Idaho, like most of the west (Montana, the Dakotas, Wyoming, NM, AZ, Utah, Nebraska and Kansas) in heavily subsidized by tax dollars that come from the northeast and west coasts, but they are blissfully unaware of that. For those who might be interested I recommend the (now slightly out-of-date) Cadillac Desert, a wonderful survey of water use and exploitation in the American west.

Your previous president never (to my dismay) took a stance against the misinterpretation of the 2nd amendment. Gun sales soared during his presidency because of fear mongering by the NRA (he wants to take your guns). There were a couple of days when the MBM was saying things like 'take them away first, due process later', which I believe would be unconstitutional (4th and 5th amendments, habeas corpus). Of course that was before he back-tracked after a meeting the the 'very good people' of the NRA, fear of whom had led him to say made the Republican caucus in Congress cowardly.

So.. how has the MBM made America or the world safer? Just because YOU feel safer in Idaho, doesn't mean you are. Since you have children who are, sad to say, probably going to breed you might take a longer view of what comprises safety. Enjoy your bark beetles!

15.03.2018 19:07:55
La ruta nos aportó otro paso natural.
Forudsigelse er meget vanskelig, især hvis det handler om fremtiden
(Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future) - Niels Bohr
As regards your life: why make a tragedy of a one act play? - Dan O'Neil
Mindy
Level 104
Status: Citizen
Sex Appeal: 880414
Reputation: 129351
Posts: 1502
Agnostica
15.03.2018 23:39:11
Mindy

DeeDee88 wrote:
When i read your post...i always have to smile:) when bimbos say "facts are facts"...and then write to a graph
"Unemployment was going down durning the entirety of the Obama presidency."
sorry...this is like school for kids and bimbo logic!
the fact of this graph is only...that the unemployment went down since a peak in 2008! That is science!!!
that Obama had any effect on this...is scientifically NOT proven!
the main effect was the bank/house/credit crises in the USA and a bit later in many other countries between 2007 and 2009.
Obama started his job as president in 2009 (!)...after the peak of the crises!
besides this bank/house/credit crises we had of course many more different effects...
- for example cheap oil from Iraq (90% of their oil goes to US companies)
- general economic rebound in USA and worldwide
- a better position of power of the USA after the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and many other countries
- continous economic, military and political pressure on other countries and regions (which has a positiv effect on american/western markets)
- sanctions against other countries (to prevent that these countries can be part of global markets and the USA can sell their own products)
...and so i could go on...
 
hehe...ok....in some points Obama had really his hands in the game. for me this makes him a good leader who cares about his own people...but a bad person in an ethical way! but well....who said that people should be good:)


BTW... his statement: take the guns first, due process later is such an incredible display of ignorance that I did not, as I usually do when I read news from your benighted shores, snort derisively: I laughed out loud. Stupid Yanks!

But I do agree with Epica. You misread her statement. 

Ad hominem? Facts is facts.

Who has claimed Obahma was the cause of the UI decreasing?  It was stated it continually went down while he was in office.  His administration returned it to where it was pre-crash.  Someone tried claiming that "trump fixed it in a year" which really wasn't the case.  The market was recovered and UI trends have continued the same trend they were on.  That is not saying Trump has done nothing, but there was not a problem with UI when he came into office.  To say BO had no effect on it is a lil silly though.  Was he the sole reason?  Of course not.  Trump is doing good things to bring jobs home, but the previous administration had a bad market and did an overall good job bringing it back

15.03.2018 23:39:11
Make your parents proud, your enemies jealous, and yourself happy.  The only thing that can prevent you is you! 

Hugz to my BL: stalker...you know who you are.  Lil creepy, but thanks for the pedestal. 
DeeDee88
Level 84
Status: Citizen
Sex Appeal: 470160
Reputation: 75253
Posts: 1208
Freethinkerland
16.03.2018 00:50:23
DeeDee88

Mindy wrote:
DeeDee88 wrote:
When i read your post...i always have to smile:) when bimbos say "facts are facts"...and then write to a graph
"Unemployment was going down durning the entirety of the Obama presidency."
sorry...this is like school for kids and bimbo logic!
the fact of this graph is only...that the unemployment went down since a peak in 2008! That is science!!!
that Obama had any effect on this...is scientifically NOT proven!
the main effect was the bank/house/credit crises in the USA and a bit later in many other countries between 2007 and 2009.
Obama started his job as president in 2009 (!)...after the peak of the crises!
besides this bank/house/credit crises we had of course many more different effects...
- for example cheap oil from Iraq (90% of their oil goes to US companies)
- general economic rebound in USA and worldwide
- a better position of power of the USA after the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and many other countries
- continous economic, military and political pressure on other countries and regions (which has a positiv effect on american/western markets)
- sanctions against other countries (to prevent that these countries can be part of global markets and the USA can sell their own products)
...and so i could go on...
 
hehe...ok....in some points Obama had really his hands in the game. for me this makes him a good leader who cares about his own people...but a bad person in an ethical way! but well....who said that people should be good:)


BTW... his statement: take the guns first, due process later is such an incredible display of ignorance that I did not, as I usually do when I read news from your benighted shores, snort derisively: I laughed out loud. Stupid Yanks!

But I do agree with Epica. You misread her statement. 

Ad hominem? Facts is facts.

Who has claimed Obahma was the cause of the UI decreasing?  It was stated it continually went down while he was in office.  His administration returned it to where it was pre-crash.  Someone tried claiming that "trump fixed it in a year" which really wasn't the case.  The market was recovered and UI trends have continued the same trend they were on.  That is not saying Trump has done nothing, but there was not a problem with UI when he came into office.  To say BO had no effect on it is a lil silly though.  Was he the sole reason?  Of course not.  Trump is doing good things to bring jobs home, but the previous administration had a bad market and did an overall good job bringing it back
You have to read the post correctly and all.
Even in the post i made a Quote of Pia's writing !!!
"Unemployment was going down durning the entirety of the Obama presidency."
And as you can read in my post...this is science for kids!!! That is simple propaganda logic. And all reasons for this i posted too!
I do not have to write it now again!
The problem of such writing is...that you implicate the fact the unemployment went down since a peak in 2008...Obama would be the reason.
And that is not true! The fact is....that the unemployment during Obama went down....because there was the peak before he came to White House in 2009!

A simple example
for kids and Pia and you:
people like you say...unemployment went down in the years of Obama...ok
what would you say now....that this was only so....because Bush Jr. was responsible for this...because the peak was in his time in the White House!
And only because of this change during Bush Jr. was is possible to keep this curse further during Obama.
So...people like Pia could say now...actually it was Bush Jr. who is responsible for this went down of the unemployment during Obama's time.
Both is true....but from the scientific view nonsense...because you can read every study very subjectively!
And that is the problem of normal people like you....who do not understand how to read studies.
You have to be for a good scientists very logical...and you should always delete every subjective view on things!
Only when you understand...how it came to such graph, data, study and so on...you know the deeper science in it!

and now this all in short for cute bimbos:

"Unemployment was going down durning the entirety of the Obama presidency."

"Unemployment was going down durning the entirety of the Obama presidency...because Bush Junior was the reason for this in 2008!"

 
both on itself you could say...correct.
but it is simple stupid propaganda trash talk:)
Democrats would use the first sentence...
Republicans the second:)

another simple example:)

"Unemployment was going down during the entirety of the Trump presidency."

that is totally correct (so far!)! We do have the data and the proves!!!
but it is nonsense:) because so far Trump had no effect on this!
he is just too short the president....and the worldwide economy is pretty good these days!





16.03.2018 00:50:23
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, but i'm not sure about the universe yet."
Carmel
Level 41
Status: Citizen
Sex Appeal: 52585
Reputation: 26615
Posts: 211
Secville
16.03.2018 01:38:36
Carmel

You bimbos scare me. I do not care for Trump because to actions speak louder than words and his actions are disgusting what type of man would grab a woman's hooha. I am 14 weeks pregnant with twins and I am on bed rest TV is my best friend. The stories I hear about the things he says are hilarious. Also I need to vent about my situation where can I do that. Can some start conversation. I need a ton of advice.

16.03.2018 01:38:36
Mindy
Level 104
Status: Citizen
Sex Appeal: 880414
Reputation: 129351
Posts: 1502
Agnostica
16.03.2018 02:29:42
Mindy

DeeDee88 wrote:
Mindy wrote:
DeeDee88 wrote:
When i read your post...i always have to smile:) when bimbos say "facts are facts"...and then write to a graph
"Unemployment was going down durning the entirety of the Obama presidency."
sorry...this is like school for kids and bimbo logic!
the fact of this graph is only...that the unemployment went down since a peak in 2008! That is science!!!
that Obama had any effect on this...is scientifically NOT proven!
the main effect was the bank/house/credit crises in the USA and a bit later in many other countries between 2007 and 2009.
Obama started his job as president in 2009 (!)...after the peak of the crises!
besides this bank/house/credit crises we had of course many more different effects...
- for example cheap oil from Iraq (90% of their oil goes to US companies)
- general economic rebound in USA and worldwide
- a better position of power of the USA after the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and many other countries
- continous economic, military and political pressure on other countries and regions (which has a positiv effect on american/western markets)
- sanctions against other countries (to prevent that these countries can be part of global markets and the USA can sell their own products)
...and so i could go on...
 
hehe...ok....in some points Obama had really his hands in the game. for me this makes him a good leader who cares about his own people...but a bad person in an ethical way! but well....who said that people should be good:)


BTW... his statement: take the guns first, due process later is such an incredible display of ignorance that I did not, as I usually do when I read news from your benighted shores, snort derisively: I laughed out loud. Stupid Yanks!

But I do agree with Epica. You misread her statement. 

Ad hominem? Facts is facts.

Who has claimed Obahma was the cause of the UI decreasing?  It was stated it continually went down while he was in office.  His administration returned it to where it was pre-crash.  Someone tried claiming that "trump fixed it in a year" which really wasn't the case.  The market was recovered and UI trends have continued the same trend they were on.  That is not saying Trump has done nothing, but there was not a problem with UI when he came into office.  To say BO had no effect on it is a lil silly though.  Was he the sole reason?  Of course not.  Trump is doing good things to bring jobs home, but the previous administration had a bad market and did an overall good job bringing it back
You have to read the post correctly and all.
Even in the post i made a Quote of Pia's writing !!!
"Unemployment was going down durning the entirety of the Obama presidency."
And as you can read in my post...this is science for kids!!! That is simple propaganda logic. And all reasons for this i posted too!
I do not have to write it now again!
The problem of such writing is...that you implicate the fact the unemployment went down since a peak in 2008...Obama would be the reason.
And that is not true! The fact is....that the unemployment during Obama went down....because there was the peak before he came to White House in 2009!

A simple example
for kids and Pia and you:
people like you say...unemployment went down in the years of Obama...ok
what would you say now....that this was only so....because Bush Jr. was responsible for this...because the peak was in his time in the White House!
And only because of this change during Bush Jr. was is possible to keep this curse further during Obama.
So...people like Pia could say now...actually it was Bush Jr. who is responsible for this went down of the unemployment during Obama's time.
Both is true....but from the scientific view nonsense...because you can read every study very subjectively!
And that is the problem of normal people like you....who do not understand how to read studies.
You have to be for a good scientists very logical...and you should always delete every subjective view on things!
Only when you understand...how it came to such graph, data, study and so on...you know the deeper science in it!

and now this all in short for cute bimbos:

"Unemployment was going down durning the entirety of the Obama presidency."

"Unemployment was going down durning the entirety of the Obama presidency...because Bush Junior was the reason for this in 2008!"

 
both on itself you could say...correct.
but it is simple stupid propaganda trash talk:)
Democrats would use the first sentence...
Republicans the second:)

another simple example:)

"Unemployment was going down during the entirety of the Trump presidency."

that is totally correct (so far!)! We do have the data and the proves!!!
but it is nonsense:) because so far Trump had no effect on this!
he is just too short the president....and the worldwide economy is pretty good these days!


"The problem of such writing is...that you implicate the fact the unemployment went down since a peak in 2008...Obama would be the reason."

Umm...no...someone else may have...I never once indicated that.  My entire reply, if you care to backtrack and read, was in reply to 'Trump fixed UI in one year' which simply is not true.  It hovered around 4.5 right before the market crashed (due largely to lack of red tape) and when BO left office it had regressed to about 4.6.  It is now 4.1...which is great and a sign of Trump bringing some good jobs home (I have never disputed that and stated I like a lot of what he is doing).  He did not "fix" it though, because it was already repaired. Some people like to think that it was 8 or 10% when he took office...it wasn't...that is not a knock, that is reality.

Who cares about bailouts?  Any government was going to do that in some fashion.  Of course they stemmed the bleeding.

Pure economics wise my big concern with Trump is that he cuts a lot of red tape.  That is great for getting the ball rolling and helping the economy grow, but it also brings a lot of risk.  I get that red tape is painful...I deal with it all the time.  Right now I am in a bi battle on 802.11 protocols with multiple levels of government...it is painful, but that red tape is there for a reason.  Could it all be more efficient?  Absolutely.  fannie and freddie failed hard...others followed.  But why did they fail?  The government (likely bought and paid for as so many are) pushed private-label securities and made changes that allowed firms to carry a very high level of risk debt.  In other words, red tape was cut to allow private companies to buy up higher risk debt...interest rates were very low (below prime actually) so the higher risk debt portfolios allowed them to back ones that were at higher rates...the restrictions on the ratio one could do this was very high.  Those high risk ones where why Stearns and Lehman got big so fast...they were collecting on higher interest and really not building the base.  Fannie and Freddie eventually caved and started doing the same because they were missing out on the housing boom that was created by companies that now had little red tape and were permitted to have huge ratios of these in their portfolios.  Fannie and Freddie watched these private labels grow for 5 years and dig into their bottom line, to the point they were showing losses.  in 2007 they joined the game and battled the private labels.  That is what both sides really stepped it up and took on ridiculous risk...no red tape.  In under a year these risks started coming back on everyone and it snowballed.

Point of all that...who cares who made the inevitable bailout.  The concern was why it ever got there, and that was because the government (Bush's administration) cut away too much bureaucracy / red tape.  Trump wants less red tape.  Substantially less.  That is heart in right place, but probably not the best results long-term.  Yes...it slows economic growth...but sometimes safeguards are worth something moving slower.

The cause was not the housing crisis...the cause was regulations (red tape) being removed.  The bubble was a result of that.  The crash was a result of the bubbl bursting.


As far as Trump having no effect on the UI going down...I do disagree.  He has persuaded multiple companies not to leave the country and some to return...and he was very hands on with that.  I agree he doesn't own the numbers...but he is a pretty big part of it.


I get a kick out of people that say "Trump is bad and can do no good" just as I get a kick out of people that say "Trump is the Saviour".  Same can be said for essentially any leader.  Reality is that they generally sit on the middle ground somewhere.  They do some great things as well as things that suck

the fact of this graph is only...that the unemployment went down since a peak in 2008! That is science!!!
that Obama had any effect on this...is scientifically NOT proven!
Really?  NO effect?  NONE?  Cmon'...this is beyond a silly statement.  So YES...."read correctly."  I responded, largely, to 2 specific things you stated.  the above, and the quote I started this post with.


16.03.2018 02:29:42
Make your parents proud, your enemies jealous, and yourself happy.  The only thing that can prevent you is you! 

Hugz to my BL: stalker...you know who you are.  Lil creepy, but thanks for the pedestal. 

Please LOGIN to post a reply.

Ximboland asks you to accept cookies for performance, social media and advertising purposes. Social media and advertising cookies of third parties are used to offer you social media functionalities and personalised ads. To get more information about these cookies and the processing of your personal data, check our Privacy & Cookie Policy.
For more information on Google's privacy policy please see here. By continuing to browse you consent to our cookies.
OK

Cookies and Policy


Cookies Policy

Ximbolands uses cookies on https://ximbo.land. By using the Service, you consent to the use of cookies.

Our Cookies Policy explains what cookies are, how we use cookies, how third-parties we may partner with may use cookies on the Service, your choices regarding cookies and further information about cookies.

What are cookies

Cookies are small pieces of text sent by your web browser by a website you visit. A cookie file is stored in your web browser and allows the Service or a third-party to recognize you and make your next visit easier and the Service more useful to you.

Cookies can be "persistent" or "session" cookies.

How Ximbolands uses cookies

When you use and access the Service, we may place a number of cookies files in your web browser.

We use cookies for the following purposes: to enable certain functions of the Service, to provide analytics, to store your preferences, to enable advertisements delivery, including behavioral advertising.

We use both session and persistent cookies on the Service and we use different types of cookies to run the Service. We may use essential cookies to authenticate users and prevent fraudulent use of user accounts.

Third-party cookies

In addition to our own cookies, we may also use various third-parties cookies to report usage statistics of the Service, deliver advertisements on and through the Service, and so on.

What are your choices regarding cookies

If you'd like to delete cookies or instruct your web browser to delete or refuse cookies, please visit the help pages of your web browser.

Please note, however, that if you delete cookies or refuse to accept them, you might not be able to use all of the features we offer, you may not be able to store your preferences, and some of our pages might not display properly.

Where can your find more information about cookies

You can learn more about cookies and the following third-party websites:

×

Frequently Asked Questions


What is Ximbo land ?
The Internet republic of Ximbo lands is the worlds first Internet republic.

What is its mission?
To unite the world.

Where is MissBimbo.com? Miss Bimbo was much better than this site.
The Internet republic of Ximbo land was created by Miss Bimbo herself and is its more intelligent successor. The old site was for junior bimbos. This site is for intelligent Ximbos.

What is the national flag of Ximbo land?
Ximbolands Flag

When was the Internet republic of Ximbo land founded
2007

What is the capital city of the Internet republic of Ximbo land?
Bimbo City

How many states make up the internet republic of Ximbo land?
There are 6 states that make up the internet republic of Ximbo lands. They are ­ Atheistia, Freethinkerland, Reasonopia, Agnostica, Secville, and Antitheocra. Bimbo City is the neutral administrative capital and is its own city zone. Boob Island is the home of the President of the Internet republic of Ximbo land

What is a Ximbo citizen?
A ‘Ximbo’ or ‘Ximbo citizen’ is a member of the internet republic of Ximbolands community.

How can I become a Ximbo citizen?
In order to become a citizen of Ximboland you must first pass the Ximbolands citizens test. It is free to become a Ximbo citizen.

What is a Ximbo senator?
A Ximbo senator is a senior member of the Internet republic of Ximbo land. Only senators are eligible to put themselves forward for election to become State Ministers and then ultimately the Prime Ximbo.

Who is the Prime Ximbo?
The Prime Ximbo is the democratically elected head of the Internet republic of Ximbo land.

Where does the Prime Ximbo live?
The Prime Ximbo lives in the Pink House for the 4 month term they are in office.

I want to become Prime Ximbo. How do I do that?
Any Ximbo citizen can become Prime Ximbo using the democratic process. Its a 3 stage process from Senator>State Minister> Prime Ximbo. All Ximbo citizens can vote in general elections but in order to put themselves forward to become Prime Ximbo they must first become a Ximbo senator. All Ximbo senators are electable as state ministers. State Minister elections take place every 4 months also. Only state ministers are eligible to then become the Prime Ximbo.

Can I become Prime Ximbo more than once?
Yes ­ a Ximbo can hold the position of Prime Ximbo for 3 terms max.

How often do elections take place?
The Internet republic of Ximbolands holds elections every 4 months for Prime Ximbo and 4 months for State Minister.

Where do important discussions take place?
The Forum.

What is the treasury/Prime Ximbos salary?
The treasury/salary is the bank account of the Internet republic of Ximbo land. This figure is transferred to the paypal account of the Prime Ximbo at the end of their 4 month term in charge.

How is the treasury calculated?
The treasury is funded by the Ximbo citizens.
A percentage of the money paid by Ximbo citizens via Paypal and SMS is transferred into the Ximbo treasury. The rest is wisely used for further game development.

What's the national colour of Ximbo land?
Pink

How old must I be in order to become a Ximbo land citizen?
Anyone over the age of 18 are welcome to become a Ximbo citizen.

When are the national holidays of Ximbo land?
Jan 1st ­ New years day
Feb 12th ­ Darwin day
Feb 14th ­ Lovers day
March 8th ­ Womens day
March 21st ­ Spring solstice
April 13th ­ The Hitchslap Day (Christopher Hitchens birthday)
May 3rd ­ National day of reason
June 21st ­ World Humanist Day
Aug 2nd ­ The Internet republic of Ximbo land national day
Sep 21st ­ Peace one day
Dec 25th ­ Newtons birthday

What is the currency of Ximbo land?
The Ximbo Dollar (B$). Currently it is pegged in value to the US$

Who is the President of Ximbo land?
Miss Bimbo is the president of Ximbo land. She founded the bimbo nation in 2007 after escaping the tyranny, bigotry and and conservatism of the old world. You can read more about her here and here

×
×

Report a problem

×

Type name of the Ximbo you are looking for...